You are now receiving instant survey notifications straight to your device! You can change the frequency fromNotification Settings.
i-Say is available in United States. Try outthis version!
Should the government pay the unemployed people more money to stop them from having to go out and do crime. Facts they pay the unemployed on average $11,000 to feed, houses and cloth themselves a year
I know a number of people who are unemployed and have been for some time. They manage because they have to, and they have not turned to crime. Only a small percentage of unemployed people turn to crime because they want more and are not prepared to work for it.
Education on how to manage what money you've got might be helpful. How to manage bills, buy groceries economically (know when the markdowns are on at your local supermarket), grow your own fruit and veg (even those with balconies can grow a few things in pots), stop going out in the car so often for items you don't NEED, give up the cigarettes (before you attack me, yeah, I know, not everyone smokes, but if you do,...See more »
Payment can be in many forms, not just monetary.
Think the Government, both at state and federal levels, need to deal with the homeless and mentally challenged situations which may lead to such events taking place out of necessity.
This is a bigger issue and one that only getting worse as governments privatise and sell off more and more housing assets forcing people in...See more »
The premise that the unemployed have to embrace a criminal life style is rather disingenuous. Some empirical evidence that the premise is valid might encourage one to look more favorably on the proposition.
There are many agencies out there to help people before they need to turn to crime. Sadly not everyone knows how to access them. And some find crime so much easier.
It's not just the initial payment that people get. There are many other benefits available, such as rent assistance, free public transport, access to courses, and more. Unfortunately, some people prefer not to work. The government offered $6,000 for people to take up fruit picking, but that didn't motivate enough people and we are flying in workers from the islands who really do want to work.
Sadly true. I accept that going to the fruit picking are to pick fruit is not practical for a single parent with school age children. But that is only a percentage of the unemployed people.
Well said Simone, sometimes we let these academics lose on a problem which then turns the whole truth upside down, your view is simple, logical and practicable, which is the one place social academics "don't" look !!!
Mostly agree with you both. Subject to the age of the children. If children are school age yes go to work, if under school age try to be there for them.
Sometimes. And it is a good idea where practical. But if you live where the only afterhours transport is private vehicle or taxi, cant drive and most jobs are afterhours. This is not always affordable.